When a vendor claims its tool has 100% test coverage, that assertion can mean different things to different people. Some think 100% coverage means complete testing -- but, sadly, that's impossible.

Code coverage is one of the most widely used quality metrics in embedded software development. Nearly every team I start working with tells me they aim to reach 80%+ code coverage. In fact, many ...

When developers and engineers measure code coverage in embedded systems they can improve their device’s safety and performance. Embedded systems play a foundational ...

Regardless of the software methodology a development team uses, unit testing is a way to ensure a baseline level of quality with every build. Some development teams discuss a unit testing strategy in ...

New dotnet-coverage tool collects code coverage for console and web applications, merges coverage reports, instruments binaries, and calculates code coverage for each test separately. Microsoft has ...

There is a difference in semantics between code coverage generated from a simulator engine and code coverage generated from a formal engine. This paper seeks to raise the awareness of verification ...

Whilethis approach may seem heavy-handed, it can be acceptable because theamount of critical code requiring MC/DC level testing is oftenrelatively small. A lack of complete test coverage almost always ...

Coverage has become a key technology in the pursuit of efficient and accurate verification of large designs. Obviously, simulation is still the cornerstone of verification, but the time when a single ...